Main Differences in Gear & Sprocket Cutting Technologies: Affordability and Quality
Typical Flame Cutting
General Application: Commercially available, for off-the-shelf machines
- Poor tooth-to-tooth spacing
- Surface blemishes, such as gouges, tears, slags and lumps commonly occur
- Teeth are not square to the face of the plate
Results: The poor quality of typical flame cut components often results in poor chain engagement; noisy operation; excessive wear; and uneven load patterns.
Cold Machining
General Application: Expensive, large-scale equipment
- Excellent quality
- Long lead times
- High minimum orders
- Cost-prohibitive rates
- Often unrealistic for many OEMs
Results: Great quality, but you’ll pay for it in time and cost (and potential costs due to waiting times)
Cogmatic Flame Machining Technology
General Application: Proprietary machines that create accurate parts
- Accurate tooth spacing throughout the sprocket circumference
- Controlled cutting speed assures a smooth finish
- Precise square tooth profile every time
Results: Accurate chain engagement, reduced noise, even wear and proper loading patterns.